I looked at the searches a prospective patient is likely to make around Sidcup and Bexley. You already perform strongly organically. The gap appears immediately above you, where larger operators are paying to be seen first.
You are already doing the difficult part well. Bexley Hearing Centre appears prominently in local organic results and carries a 4.9-star reputation. The issue is what happens immediately above those listings: Audika, Boots, Hearing Expert and other larger operators are paying to meet the same patient first.
This is an adjustable commercial model, not a revenue forecast. Change the inputs to figures that are closer to Bexley Hearing Centre's own patient values and budget.
Select a scenario to see how cumulative net return changes as the campaign matures. The cautious year-one case is deliberately modest. The model becomes more attractive if acquisition efficiency improves after the initial learning period.
The £950 monthly fee covers the campaign, tracking, optimisation and reporting. The remaining fee is tied to patients who progress to a fitting, so part of what you pay us rises only when the campaign creates commercial value. You get the depth and tooling of an agency, with one person directly accountable for the strategy and performance.